Geek Upd8 - Online Law Reporter

Latest Post

Maker of confession may be bound thereby but not those who had been implicated therein

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- S.B. Sinha, Dr. Mukundakam Sharma and H.L. Dattu, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 1397 of 2007. D/d. 31.03.2009.

U.O.I. - Appellant
Versus
Bal Mukund & Ors. - Respondents

For the Appearing Parties :- Sushil Kumar, Sr. Advocate with B.B. Singh, Ms. Binu Tamta, Ms. Sushma Suri, Santosh Kuma, D.M. Nargolkar, Shakil Ahmed Syed, Ms. Praveena Gautam and C.D. Singh, Advocates.
Supreme Court of India Judgments

JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J. - Union of India is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 13.05.2005 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Criminal Appeal Nos. 964 and 1108 of 2000.
2. The factual matrix involved herein is as under :
    Sub-Inspector Bajrang Lal posted in the Office of the Central Bureau of Narcotics, Ratlam purported to have obtained a secret information to the effect that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein Bal Mukund and Basanti Lal would be carrying about 20 Kg. of Opium on the next day. A preventive party allegedly was formed pursuant to or in furtherance of the said information. At about 0430 hours on 21.06.1998, they reached Nayapura Phanta on Ratlam Jaora Road. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were seen carrying cement gunny bags. They were searched. 10 Kgs. of Opium packed in 5 polythene bag of 2 Kg.

Ban on Jalikattu under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 : SC

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Dipak Misra and N.V. Ramana, JJ.
I.A. No. 6 of 2016 in Writ Petition(s) (Civil) Nos. 24 of 2016. D/d. 13.1.2016.

Compassion Unlimited Plus Action - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and Ors. - Respondents

For the Petitioners :- C.A. Sundaram, Sidharth Luthra, Anand Grover, Ms. Aparna Bhat, Sr. Advs., Ms. Rohini Musa, Abhishek
Gupta, Zaffar Inayat, Ms. Anjali Sharma, Balraj Dewan, Ajit Sharma, P. Ramesh Kumar, Ms. Tara Narula, Ms. Tanima Kishore, Ms. Supriya Juneja, Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Nithya Rajehekar, Mihir Samson, Ravi Chandra Prakash, Ranvir Singh Chillar, Ajit Sharma, Bijan Ghosh, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- M. Yogesh Kanna, Jayant Patel, Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Anand Landge, Sriram P., Vishnu Shankar Jain, Ms. Aditi Mohan, Ankur S. Kulkarni, M.Y. Deshmukh, Aniruddya Rajput (for M/s Lemax Lawyers & Co.), N. Rajaraman, Advocates.

ORDER
Taken on Board.
2. The application for intervention stands allowed.

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Before :- B. Prakash Rao, J.
C.R.P. No. 160 of 2003. D/d. 17.10.2003

S. Nagappa - Petitioner
Versus
K.P. Hanumappa - Respondent

For the Petitioner :- Mr. K. Rathangapani Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent :- Mr. I. Venkata Prasad, Advocate.
Andhra Pradesh High Court Judgments

ORDER
B. Prakash Rao, J. - The petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, seeks to assail the orders in E.A. No. 507 of 2002 in O.S. No. 931 of 1998,

KERALA HIGH COURT

Before :- K. Hema, J.
Crl.RP No. 4487 & 3275 of 2006. D/d. 21.03.2007.

Jose - Petitioner
Versus
P.C. Joy - Respondent

For the Petitioner :- R. Santhosh Babu, Advocate.
For the Respondent :- Pirappancode V.S. Sudheer, Advocate.
Kerala High Court, Ernakulam Judgments

ORDER
K. Hema, J. - The revision petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Magistrate court to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 5 months for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act').

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- V. Gopala Gowda and D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 3625 of 2005. D/d. 5.10.2016.

Sheela Hirba Naik Gaunekar - Appellant
Versus
Apollo Hospitals Ltd. & Anr. - Respondents

And
Civil Appeal Nos. 4408 of 2005.
Apollo Hospitals Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Sheela Hirba Naik Gaunekar - Respondents
For Appellants (CA No. 3625 of 2005) :- Ms. Shobha, Shrey Dambhare, Advocates.
For the Appellants (CA No. 4408 of 2005) :- Ms. Surekha Raman, Ms. Niharika, Aman Shukla, Pratap Venugopla, (For M/s. K.J. John & Co.), Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Ms. Surekha Raman, Ms. Niharika, Aman Shukla, Pratap Venugopla, (For M/s. K.J. John & Co.), Gautam Narayan, R.A. Iyer, Shatrajit Banerji, Siddhartha Chowdhury, Ms. Shobha, Shrey Dambhare, Advocates.
Supreme Court of India Judgments

ORDER
The present appeals arise out of an order dated 13.05.2005, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission") in Original Petition No. 103 of 1997. Appeals before this Court have been filed by the complainant as well as the Apollo Hospital, urging various legal contentions.
2. Since the facts in both the appeals are identical, for the sake of convenience we refer to the facts

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Jagdish Singh Khehar and S.A. Bobde, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 213 Of 2013. D/d. 26.10.2016.

State of Punjab & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Jagjit Singh & Ors. - Respondents

With
Civil Appeal No. 10356 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil).31676 Cc No. 15616 of 2011), Civil Appeal No.10357 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) 31677 Cc No. 16434 of 2011), Civil Appeal No.10358 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 37162 of 2012), Civil Appeal No. 10360 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 37164 of 2012), Civil Appeal No.10361 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 37165 of 2012), Civil Appeal No. 211 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 212 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 214 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 217 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 218 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 219 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 220 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 221 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 222 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 223 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 224 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 225 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 226 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 227 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 228 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 229 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 230 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 231 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 232 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 233 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 234 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 235 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 236 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 245 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 246 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 247 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 248 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 249 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 257 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 260 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 262 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 966 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2231 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2299 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2300 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2301 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2702 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 7150 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 8248 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 8979 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 9295 of 2013, Civil Appeal No. 10362 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 9464 of 2013), Civil Appeal No. 10363 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 11966 of 2013), Civil Appeal No. 10364 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 17707 of 2013), Civil Appeal No. 10365 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 24410 of 2013), Civil Appeal No. 871 of 2014, Civil Appeal No. 10366 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No. 4340 of 2014), Civil Appeal No. 10527 of 2014.
For the Appellants :- Rakesh Khanna, AAG, Jagjit Singh Chhabra & for Ms. Kaveeta Wadia, for Mr. Kuldip Singh, for M/s. Mahalakshmi Balaji & Co., for Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Brijesh Kr. Tamber, (for A.V. Balan), Prem Prakash, Mukesh K. Verma, Ramesh Goyal, (for Ashwani Bhardwaj), Vijendra Kasana, Chand Qureshi (for Dr. Kailash Chand), Shish Pal Laler, S.D. Sharma, Sonit Sinhmar (for Balbir Singh Gupta), Himanshu Gupta, Dinesh Verma, for S.L. Aneja, for Subhasish Bhowmick, Vikas Mahajan, Vishal Mahajan, Vinod Sharma, for B.Y. Kulkarni, Ajay Kumar Singh, Ujjal Singh, J.P. Singh, for R.C. Kaushik, Ms. Manju Sharma, Anil Kumar Tandale, Ashok Mathur, Varun Punia, A.S. Pundir, Ms. Vanita Mehta, Balraj Dewan, Varinder Kumar Sharma, Yash Pal Dhingra, Advocates.
Supreme Court of India Judgments

JUDGMENT
Jagdish Singh Khehar, J. - Delay in filing and refiling Special Leave Petition (Civil).... CC no. 15616 of 2011, and Special Leave Petition (Civil).... CC no. 16434 of 2011 is condoned. Leave is granted in all special leave petitions.
2. A division bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in State of Punjab & Ors. v. Rajinder Singh & Ors. (2009(4) S.C.T. 88 : LPA no. 337 of 2003, decided on 7.1.2009), set aside, in an intra-court appeal

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget