Geek Upd8 - Online Law Reporter

Latest Post

Sachin & Anr. Versus Jhabbu Lal & Anr. on 24 November, 2016


Before :- Pratibha Rani, J.
RSA No. 136 of 2016 & CM No. 19123 of 2016. D/d. 24.11.2016.

Sachin & Anr. - Appellants
Jhabbu Lal & Anr. - Respondents

For the Appellant No.1 :- In person.
For the Respondent :- Rakesh Kumar, Advocate with respondents in person.
Delhi High Court, Delhi Judgments

Pratibha Rani, J. (Oral) - The appellant No.1, who is present in person, requests for an adjournment on the ground that he wants to change his counsel. The appellants are enjoying an ex-parte interim stay granted in their favour on 20th May, 2016

K.V. Prakash Babu Versus State of Karnataka on 22 November, 2016


Before :- Dipak Misra and Amitava Roy, JJ.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1138-1139 of 2016 (@ S.L.P. (Crl) Nos. 5928-5929 of 2016). D/d. 22.11.2016.

K.V. Prakash Babu - Appellant
State of Karnataka - Respondent

For the Appellant :- S.R. Singh, Sr. Adv., Anurag Thomas, B. Vishwanath Bhandarkar, H.K. Naik, Karunakar Mahalik, Advocates.
For the Respondent :- V.N. Raghupathy, Advocate.
Supreme Court of India Judgments

Dipak Misra, J. - Leave granted.
2. The instant appeals reveal a factual score that has the potentiality to shock a sensitive mind and a sincere heart, for the materials brought on record show how "suspicion" can corrode the rational perception of value of life and cloud the thought of a wife to such an extent, that would persuade her to commit suicide which entail more deaths, that is, of the alleged paramour, her mother and brother who being not able to emotionally cope up with the social humiliation, extinguish their life-spark; and ultimately the situation ropes in the husband to face the charge for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 498-A

Continuing Your Education With Healthcare Administration Course Online
The longer that you work in a specific position, the easier it will be for you to feel unsatisfied. When your career does not offer room for growth, it can put your entire life at a standstill. While this is going to be a bit frustrating, it is also a problem with an easy solution. Going back to school can help you to expand your opportunities for the future while adding to the amount of knowledge that you have about your specific field.


Before :- Dalveer Bhandari and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 1196 of 2007. D/d. 23.09.2008.

Hemaji Waghaji Jat - Appellant
Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan & Others - Respondents

Supreme Court of India Judgments

Dalveer Bhandari, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.12.2004 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Second Appeal No. 146 of 2004.
2. Brief facts of the case which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as under :-
    The appellant who has lost both before the Court of learned District Judge, Palanpur and the High Court has approached this Court by way of special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution.

Women whose marriage has been declared void is entitled to claim maintenance under Domestic Violence Act

Priti Dey (Chandra) Versus Subhasish Dey & Anr on 6 April, 2016


Before:- Sankar Acharyya, J.
C.R.R. No. 3963 of 2013. D/d. 6.4.2016.

Priti Dey (Chandra) - Petitioner
Subhasish Dey & Anr. - Opposite Parties

For the Petitioner :- Abhijit Kr. Adhya, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties :- Dipankar Dandapath, Advocate.

Calcutta High Court, West Bengal Judgments

Sankar Acharyya, J. - This revisional application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) has been directed challenging the judgment and order dated 30.08..2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Purulia in Criminal Appeal No. 22 of 2012 under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short P.W.D.V. Act) setting aside an order dated 25.09.2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Purulia in Miscellaneous Case No. 131 of 2012 under the provision of the P.W.D.V. Act.


Before :- B.S. Chauhan And Dipak Misra, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 870 of 2007. D/d. 21.5.2012.

State of Rajasthan - Appellant
Darshan Singh @ Darshan Lal - Respondents

For the Appellant :- Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG, Rajasthan, Mr. Milind Kumar, Advocates

Supreme Court of India Judgments

Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. - This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 29.5.2006 in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 96 of 2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur setting aside the judgment and order dated 15.1.2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Hanumangarh, convicting the respondent herein of the offences punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#} {twitter#} {google-plus#} {pinterest#} {youtube#}

Contact Form


Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget