Geek Upd8 - Law Reporter

Latest Judgments


You might have been injured because of the negligence of someone else. If this is the case, you need to seek out a lawyer who will defend your rights in a court of law. It is important that the person or company who is responsible for your injuries is forced to compensate you for lost wages if you are not able to work. There are many lawyers who specialize in personal injury cases. However, you need to carefully look at all of your options. Do not simply hire the first lawyer you find. The following tips will assist you in finding a competent personal injury lawyer.

Supreme Court of India at Delhi Judgments available for download as PDF

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707695

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Harjit Singh Bedi and J.M. Panchal, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 1252 of 2006. D/d. 11.8.2009.

State of Punjab - Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Singh - Respondent

For the Appellant:- H.M. Singh, Ms. Jasneet Kuar, Praveen Kumar Singh and Kuldip Singh, Advocates.
For the Respondent :- Sushil Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Tajinder Kuar, Aditya Kumar, Mennakshi Kumar and Sheetal Prasad Juneja.

JUDGMENT

Harjit Singh Bedi, J. - This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the judgment and order dated 22.07.2004 in Criminal Appeal No. 481 of 1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the High Court had allowed the appeal filed by the accused-respondent Rajinder Singh setting aside his conviction and sentence of life imprisonment and fine under Section 302 IPC and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, by giving him the benefit of doubt and had also dismissed the appeal against acquittal filed by the appellant-State against the acquittal of Kuldip Singh and Rachhpal Singh, by the Sessions Judge, Faridkot.

Calcutta High Court, West Bengal Judgments

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707694

Calcutta High Court

Before:- Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
Civil Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.O. No. 631 of 2018

Smt. Bindu Dadlani
Vs
Smt. Gita Ghosh

Judgment

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.
The defendant in an eviction suit has filed the instant application. The petitioner had filed her examination-in-chief in connection with an application under Section 7(1) and (2) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 and had sought an opportunity to lead evidence. On a particular date, when petitioner was absent, such prayer of the petitioner, for leading evidence, was turned down by the trial court. Challenging such order, refusing leading of evidence, the petitioner preferred a revisional application, giving rise to C.O. No. 4158 of 2017, which is still pending in this Court. Vide order dated December 21, 2017, a coordinate bench of this Court directed the revisional application to appear on a returnable date and granted the petitioner liberty to pray for adjournment before the court below.

Supreme Court of India at Delhi Judgments available for download as PDF

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707693

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- K.T. Thomas and R.P. Sethi, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 7194 of 2000 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 13022 of 1998). D/d. 11.12.2000.

Ratansingh - Appellant
Versus
Vijaysingh and others - Respondents

For the Appellant :- Mr. A.K. Chitale, Sr.Advocate with Ms. Shilpa Chitale and Mr. Niraj Sharma, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

K.T. Thomas, J. - Leave granted.
2. A decree-holder after securing a decree went into slumber and remained as such for a pretty long period like a Rip Van Winkle. When he awoke he realised that his decree became rust corroded and lost its enforceability due to efflux of a number of years. In his search to find out at least a straw to cling on he came across an order of the High Court by which a Second Appeal preferred by his opposite party was dismissed as time barred. The Execution Court resuscitated the decree with the help of the said order, but the District Court in a revision held otherwise. This appeal by Special Leave is against the order of the District Court as the High Court shut its door for the decree-holder when he knocked at it. The High Court pointed out to him that the revisional powers of the High Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'the Code') had already been exercised by the District Court on which such powers were delegated in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Lawyers come in all levels of experience and skill. Do not be fooled into thinking that it does not matter which lawyer you choose. There are many people who seriously believe that all lawyers are basically identical because they all had to graduate from law school. The reality is much different. The first thing you need to understand is that all law schools are not the same. Some are more prestigious than others. These elite law schools give their students a high quality education.

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget