Guidelines and Directions to Social NGOs, Police, Lawyers and Courts in 498a and 406 IPC matters in order to salvage and save the institution of marriage - Delhi High Court

Guidelines and Directions to Social NGOs, Police, Lawyers and Courts in 498a and 406 IPC matters in order to salvage and save the institution of marriage - Delhi High Court
DELHI HIGH COURT 
Before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kailash Gambhir
Bail Application No. 1627/2008
D/d - 04.08.2008
Chander Bhan and Anr - Petitioners
versus
State - Respondent

Through: Mr. Rajesh Khanna Adv.
Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma APP

Questions :
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? yes
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? yes

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J. (Oral)

By way of the present petition the petitioners who are parentsin-law of the complainant seek grant of anticipatory bail. Mr. Sharma counsel for the State submits that allegations are serious in nature against the petitioners, therefore, the petitioners do not deserve grant of anticipatory bail. Complainant is present in the court. She states that there is no possibility of her going back to the matrimonial home. However, the complainant is not averse to the matter being sent before the mediation cell. Let the matter be sent to the Mediation Cell, Rohini Court, Delhi for exploringthe possibility of amicable settlement between the parties.
Let the parties appear before the Mediation Cell, Rohini Court, Delhi on 11.8.2008 at 4.00 P.M. List the matter before the court on 23.9.2008. Till then the petitioners shall not be arrested. Before parting with this case, I deem it expedient and in the larger interest of saving matrimony of the couples and to restore peace between the two hostile families of husband and wife who once must have celebrated the marriage of couple with great zeal, fervor and enthusiasm but when faced with many facets and stark realities of life entangled themselves to fight a long drawn legal battle instead of building confidence, trust, understanding, mutual respect for each other and their respective families. The offence of cruelty by husband or relatives of husband (Section 498-A)  was added in 1986 to curb the vise of subjecting women to coerce them or their relatives to meet unlawful demands for dowry. Since its enactment, this provision has been subjected to systematic and sustained attack. It has been called unfair and responsible for the victimisation of husbands by their wives and her relatives. No doubt there may be many deserving cases where women are being subjected to mental and physical cruelty at the hands of the avaricious in-laws. But such cases have to be distinguished from other cases where merely due to trivial fights and ego clashes the matrimony is facing disaster. What is not comprehended by young minds while invoking the provisions of the likes of Section 498-A and 406 of IPC is that these provisions to a large extent have done incalculable harm in breaking matrimony of the couples. Despite the western culture influencing the young minds of our country, still it has been seen that Indian families value their own age old traditions and culture, where, mutual respect, character and morals are still kept at a very high pedestal. It has been noticed in diverse cases, where the brides and their family members in litigation find the doors of conciliation shut from the side of groom and his family members only on account of there having suffered the wrath of Police harassment first at the stage when matter is pending before crime against women cell and thereafter at the time of seeking grant of anticipatory or regular bail and then the ordeal of long drawn trial. Daily, matters come before this court seeking bail and for quashing of FIR's registered under Sections 498A/406 of the IPC. This court is of the view that it is essential to lay down some broad guidelines and to give directions in such matters in order to salvage and save the institution of marriage and matrimonial homes of the couples.


Guidelines
1. Social workers/NGO
There is no iota of doubt that most of the complaints are filed in the heat of the moment over trifling fights and ego clashes. It is also a matter of common knowledge that in their tussle and ongoing hostility the hapless children are the worst victims. Before a wife moves to file a complaint with the Women Cell, a lot of persuasion and conciliation is required.
The Delhi Legal Service Authority, National Commission for Women, NGO's and social worker?s working for upliftment of women should set up a desk in crime against women cell to provide them with conciliation services, so that before the State machinery is set in motion, the matter is amicably settled at that
very stage. But, if ultimately even after efforts put by the social workers reconciliation seems not possible then the matter should be undertaken by the police officials of Crime against Women cell and there also, serious efforts should be made to settle the matter amicably.

2. Police Authorities:
(a) Pursuant to directions given by the Apex Court, the Commissioner of Police, Delhi vide Standing Order No. 330/2007 had already issued guidelines for arrest in the dowry cases registered under Sections 498-A/406 IPC and the said guidelines should be followed by the Delhi Police strictly and scrupulously.
(i) No case under Section 498-A/406 IPC should be registered without the prior approval of DCP/Addl. DCP.
(ii) Arrest of main accused should be made only after thorough investigation has been conducted and with the prior approval of the ACP/DCP.
(iii) Arrest of the collateral accused such as father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law etc should only be made after prior approval of DCP on file.
(b) Police should also depute a well trained and a well behaved staff in all the crime against women cells  specially the lady officers, all well equipped with the abilities of perseverance, persuasion, patience and forbearance.
(c) FIR in such cases should not be registered in a routine manner.
(d) The endeavor of the Police should be to scrutinize complaints very carefully and then register FIR.
(e) The FIR should be registered only against those persons against whom there are strong allegations of causing any kind of physical or mental cruelty as well as breach of trust.
(f) All possible efforts should be made, before recommending registration of any FIR, for reconciliation and in case it is found that there is no possibility of settlement, then necessary steps in the first instance be taken to ensure return of stridhan and dowry articles etc. by the accused party to the complainant

3. Lawyers:
Lawyers also have a great responsibility in this regard.
(a) While drafting pleadings/complaints, the lawyers should not unnecessarily suggest incorporation of wild allegations, or in character assassination of any of the parties or their family members whatever the case may  be.
(b) Lawyers are also to endeavour to bring about amicable settlement between the parties as they are  expected to discharge sacred duty as social engineers in such cases instead of making them target for monetary considerations by multiplying their cases.

4. Courts:
Subordinate courts, be it trying civil or criminal cases concerning bail, maintenance, custody, divorce or other related matters shall in the first instance, in every case where it is possible so to do consistently with the nature and circumstances of the case, to make every endeavour to bring about reconciliation between the parties.
a) The first endeavor should be for possible reunion and restitution of the parties and as a last endeavor to bring about peaceful separation.
b) If possible extra time should be devoted to such matters to restore peace in the lives of rival parties be it by re-uniting them or even in case of their parting ways.
c) Conciliatory proceedings by the court should preferably be held in camera to avoid embarrassment.
d) Wherever, the courts are overburdened with the work, necessary assistance of Mediation and Conciliation cells should be sought.

Apart from above directions it would not be out of place to ask parties also to themselves adopt a conciliatory approach without intervention of any outside agency and unless there are very compelling reasons, steps for launching prosecution against any spouse or his/her in-laws be not initiated just in a
huff, anger, desperation or frustration.

DASTI.

COMMENTS

BLOGGER: 3
  1. Guidelines and Directions to Social NGO's, Police, Lawyers and -Courts in 498a and 406 IPC matters posted on Geek Upd8 - Law Blog thanks to Advocate Narayan Dutt - http://g8.geekupd8.com/DelhiHC04Aug08

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jastej Singh, Advocate8 January 2013 at 11:35

    It's a very laudable step. I don't say that these provisions should be scraped, but it is a truth that these provisions are being misused now. Married woman instead of co-oping with the married life and pressures are now adverting to these provisions and which ultimately lead to such scars that destroys the institution of marriage altogether. The married couples do not see the implications of divorces on the minds of their little children. Divorces lead to frustrated life which has its own consequences. For ex: Mass murders being committed in Western Countries. I am afraid that even our country is also going in the same direction and in a decade or two, we will also be hearing the same news of massacres by juveniles and traumatized lot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. hanumantarao kempalli7 August 2013 at 16:21

    This is Indian humanity that's all

    ReplyDelete

Name

138-NIA,23,498A,41,Abduction,1,Acquittal,16,Adverse-Possession,5,Advocates,61,Allahabad,3,Andhra-Pradesh,1,Answers,2,Bail,37,Bare-Acts,55,Bombay,17,Calcutta,7,Canada,11,Chhattisgarh,3,Civil-Cases,81,Complaint,2,Constitution,7,Consumer-Forum,7,Conviction,6,Copyright-Patent,3,Corruption,5,Courts,3,Criminal-Cases,291,CrPC,37,Cyber-Laws,7,Defamation,2,Delhi,21,Divorce,25,Dowry,14,Drafting,5,Employment-Laws,4,Events,4,Evidence,11,Execution,7,Famous-Cases,16,Foreign-Visa,6,Free-Legal-Advice,9,G8-Lawyers,8,Gauhati,1,Geek-Upd8,4,Guest-Post,1,Gujarat,4,Health-Laws,9,Heidi-MacDonald,4,High-Court,280,Himachal,1,How-To,19,Immigration,8,India,342,Information-Technology-Act,7,Insurance,8,Inter-State-Association-Lawyers,10,International,7,IPC-1860,4,Jammu-Kahmir,1,Jharkhand,1,Judgments,381,Juvenile,7,Karnataka,1,Kerala,3,Law,343,Law-Degree,12,Legal-Rights,20,Lekh-Raj-Sharma,5,Madhya-Pradesh,3,Madras,4,Manipur,1,Mansa,11,Matrimonial,46,Murder,44,Navneet-Khudania,4,NDPS-Act,16,News-Media,89,Notice,11,NRI,3,Patna,1,Pauper-Suit,1,Personal-Injury-Law,30,Police,13,Politics,13,Popular,10,Privy-Council,1,Public-Interest-Litigation,3,Puneet-Batish,11,Punjab-Haryana,30,Quashing,7,Rajasthan,2,Rape,52,Review,1,RTI,4,Service-Matter,11,Services,1,Sneha-Jaiswal,7,Society,81,Support,142,Supreme-Court,194,Terrorism,7,Theft,3,United-States,3,USA,81,Uttarakhand,2,Videos,5,Women,22,Writ,5,
ltr
item
Geek Upd8 - Law Reporter: Guidelines and Directions to Social NGOs, Police, Lawyers and Courts in 498a and 406 IPC matters in order to salvage and save the institution of marriage - Delhi High Court
Guidelines and Directions to Social NGOs, Police, Lawyers and Courts in 498a and 406 IPC matters in order to salvage and save the institution of marriage - Delhi High Court
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NhIMIoMYifA/UOltBj5cmWI/AAAAAAAACGg/MWvKbcbdyf4/s1600/Guidelines-Directions-Social-NGOs-Police-Lawyers-Courts-498a-406-IPC-matters-in-order-to-salvage-and-save-institution-of-marriage-Delhi-High-Court.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-NhIMIoMYifA/UOltBj5cmWI/AAAAAAAACGg/MWvKbcbdyf4/s72-c/Guidelines-Directions-Social-NGOs-Police-Lawyers-Courts-498a-406-IPC-matters-in-order-to-salvage-and-save-institution-of-marriage-Delhi-High-Court.jpg
Geek Upd8 - Law Reporter
https://law.geekupd8.com/2013/01/Guidelines-Directions-Social-NGOs-Police-Lawyers-Courts-498a-406-IPC-matters-in-order-to-salvage-and-save-institution-of-marriage-Delhi-High-Court.html
https://law.geekupd8.com/
https://law.geekupd8.com/
https://law.geekupd8.com/2013/01/Guidelines-Directions-Social-NGOs-Police-Lawyers-Courts-498a-406-IPC-matters-in-order-to-salvage-and-save-institution-of-marriage-Delhi-High-Court.html
true
9019969284714235428
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share. STEP 2: Click the link you shared to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy